Possession is Nine-Tenths of the Law

Murdoch_owns_news

As the media is viewed as an intangible information and communication system, we can often forget that it is physically owned. Media is a multi-million dollar industry that, not dissimilar to most industries, is dominated by a small group of owners. Just as “umbrella”  empire Cocoa-Cola owns multiple smaller companies, shareholders and business owners have taken hold of media entities that control multiple networks, newspapers and magazines, publishing houses, film companies and, more recently, social networks.

Media ownership in Australia is extremely concentrated. Most Australians will recognise the titles of Newscorp and Fairfax Media who, together, own all major newspapers within the country. Newscorp is owned by media tycoon Rupert Murdoch, whose media web expands internationally and comprises of multiple media platforms such as Foxtel, The Daily Telegraph and Vogue Australia (to name a few of many). Lachlan Murdoch, heir to the Murdoch enterprise, has holds in news providers such as Nova and Network Ten. Additionally, Gina Rinehart staked millions of dollars in shares in Australian media, only recently selling out of Fairfax.

So what does this mean for the Australian media consumer? With the spread of media ownership growing increasingly smaller, bias is definitely a rising concern. Not only is it about what is being printed, it’s also about what information isn’t being revealed. Traditionally, journalism has been ethically rooted in impartial communication; that is, delivering fact without attempting to persuade society towards a certain opinion. However, as information became more corporately owned, proprietors have been able to control the reveal of information and direct stories in the way they choose. There have been many allocations made against Murdoch publishing his own version of the truth, as written in Independent Australia, portraying the media they own as a tool to be manipulated:

‘…the Australian Journalists Association, in a submission to the Australian Broadcasting Tribunal, alleged that Murdoch was an autocratic and unprincipled proprietor who demanded that his lackeys publish distorted accounts of the news when it suited him.’

This would be more accepted and inconspicuous if each media organisation was separately owned, as it would provide media consumers with a range of differing opinions. As the diversity of media ownership declines, so does variety in representation, resulting in a concentration of ideological exemplification.

In theory, information should not be taken ownership of and should be freely accessible. In reality, the trade of information has turned commercial and can be manipulated by those with the power to do so. Modern media is dominated by the government, publicity and scandals, with public relations monitoring communication with the public through various platforms. Media seems to be becoming less controllable as it expands, with technology providing several different access points for the divulging and consumption of information. Never before have there been so many providers of media; technology has allowed the average media consumer to also become the producer, whether this is through blogs or social media websites.

Whilst there are definitely owners of media corporations such as broadcasting networks and newspapers, the online sphere is unattainable of such ownership, and is overtaking traditional journalism as the platform for society accessing mass media. This evolvement poses the question; are we the new owners of the media?

References:

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Possession is Nine-Tenths of the Law

  1. I love the first sentence of this blog post, as it brings the two opposites (tangibility and intangibility) together in relation to one concept (that concept being information). The fact that you’ve brought up the idea of information being withheld by media owners within the first section of the blog is good too, as it got me thinking about the idea throughout the rest of the post. I suggest you check out the “Journalists’ Code of Ethics” (as it popped into my mind as I was reading), and think about how the journalists today are finding loop-holes to get through, in order to manipulate information before releasing it for the consumption of the general public. I also like that you’ve talked about how social media platforms and technology have become a way for information to be taken out of context, and acknowledged that everyone has become more of an information producer, rather than the traditional ideas of being consumers. All-round solid post. Keep it up!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s